Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyber Cross

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Due to low participation, this is closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. Mz7 (talk) 06:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cyber Cross

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Two-line stub unsourced since 2007, fails V and N. See the analogous Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross Wiber. Sandstein 10:12, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 11:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Giant Bomb, Video Game Den Magazine Review, Computer and Video Game Magazine Review - The two magazine reviews should be enough to prove notoriety. I also feel like the old AfD for Cross Wiber was poorly reviewed, as there are several magazines that published reviews, that can be easily seen by one look at Mobygames Reviews for Cross Wiber. Lee Vilenski(talk) 10:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 ^Talk 03:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.