Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DDtrac

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 01:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DDtrac

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline case of non-notable software from non-notable developer. Orange Mike | Talk 22:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep / Merge with Developing Minds Software - Between the company and the software product there does appear to be sufficient coverage to establish notability although each individually is probably borderline. |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 14:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see the merged article meeting notability either. Note that the Eparent article referenced in the article is written by the founder of Developing Minds and creator of the DDTrac software. -- Whpq (talk) 15:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator, the merge target isn't notable either so placing this there isn't going to fix the problem. On the other hand, if there is non-trivial coverage on this particular subject I would be in favor of retaining it... but I cannot find any. JBsupreme (talk) 07:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 05:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and merge per UrbanRenewal. It seems adopted in the autism community, with some coverage by autism websites [1] , [2] , [3] ; plus it has been used in at least one academic research [4]. I would merge Developing Minds Software within this article. --Cycl^opia - ^talk 11:03, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:07, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In addition to the sources found by Cyclopia, I found this article from American City Business Journals. Notability is fully established. Cunard (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.