Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Damian Callinan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer at 03:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Damian Callinan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline comedian, but seems to me to fall on the non-notable side of the line. Orange Mike | Talk 23:22, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: insufficiently notable. I am always a bit suspicious when an article states that so and so has done "countless TV performances, radio gigs, live gigs, corporate performances and workshops." Quis separabit? 19:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have added more sources. This is a well-known Australian comedian who has traveled nationally and has been reviewed in major newspapers. Clare. (talk) 03:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:58, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the two new references to articles in the reliable source Sydney Morning Herald are convincing, particularly the first article which is substantial, so that WP:BASIC is passed. Atlantic306 (talk) 18:14, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Clearer consensus needed st170e^talk 00:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The subject passes WP:BASIC. Source examples include, but are not limited to those listed below. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.