Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Weichel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:30, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Weichel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has only 1 top tier MMA fight and coverage appears to be routine sports reporting so he fails both WP:NMMA and WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 20:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. czar · · 22:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 22:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. czar · · 22:01, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - unless there's a rule set out somewhere which gives a minimum number of MMA fights needed to qualify for a page (if there isn't, then one fight sounds like enough to me)Sophiahounslow (talk) 10:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The MMA notability criteria at WP:NMMA state that a minimum of 3 top tier fights are required to show notability.Mdtemp (talk) 17:54, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NMMA. NodachiFury (talk) 21:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely fails WP:NMMA and I didn't find any WP:SIGCOV. Winning a championship in a second tier organization does not show notability. Papaursa (talk) 20:03, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Somewhat inherent notability claim in the article. His record falls short of WP:NMMA and does not have the WP:SIGCOV, outside WP:ROUTINE and WP:Run of the mill, required to make a solid GNG claim. Mkdw ^talk 23:07, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.