Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dariusz Zawiślak

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wow. After reading this, I need a nice relaxing trip to a spa Fritzpoll (talk) 11:14, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dariusz Zawiślak

[edit]
Dariusz Zawiślak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Cross-wiki spam based on primary sources (Original research). Probably COI because all articles in different languages were created by user:Kirk diamond and user:MARTHA WARTA 2000. Deleted 10 times in Polish wikipedia, the last one as non-notable: [1]. Several wikipedias have deleted the article:

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —AntiCross (talk) 23:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I can see your point. What's Martha's relationship with Zawislak? A gf perhaps? Possible COI, no independently demonstrated notability. JamesBurns (talk) 08:06, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a director and producer of several films including 2 movies with Faye Dunaway and if movies are ency and actors too, so director also (i gues), all articles on other wiki was speedy deletion cose was't external links or notes to the articel and maybe wikiwars too, see all in same days, but in some countries they definitelly keep and even enlarge. (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.75.62.223 (talk)
  • I would like to say only that informations about Dariusz Zawiślak are based on: hollywood reporter, the bussines of film, variety - very serious film bussines newsletters and film dedicated webs like IMDb Kirk (UTC)
  • Keep - I don't like this promotionlike campaign. But the person Zawislak is real, any motivations of article creation have no matter to its quality. Just now it looks like a normal small article about a living person with notable achievements in film industry. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:37, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete This is rubbish! Не dirty encyclopedia! --Many baks (talk) 07:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I even prepare french article for this subject and specially the movies--SMALLMEE (talk) 13:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Unless the polish wiki is more strict then wiki (like the German is) i think we should to. Also, being a director of a movie doesn't make you notable just as being an actor in am ovie doesn't make you notable. --Ssteiner209 (talk) 13:37, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep ::polish wiki keep article about Zawislak two movies: swiateczna przygoda and balladyna They keep after DNU after they (so fast in my opinion) deleted - (Notable: He produced few international productions -again my opinion) Zawislak. That was MY FAULT and they BLAME me but I only put new information to polish wiki (Im not a spammer just only ad NEW article to wiki. OK I dont do so professional like MARTHA do and I understand they decide to delete all what i do but Martha made small professional article and please dont blame director for my work and consider without emotional angry this person. All the best. I see my mistake I should prepare links and notes to these article and find more info like Marth do. --Kirk diamond (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:40, 13 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
  • Comment: interesting how the editors above voting keep have very few edits on wikipedia, not helped by their Polish IP addresses. JamesBurns (talk) 03:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Very boring cross-wiki spam. MARTHA WARTA 2000 is a sockpuppet of Kirk diamond, look checkuser request on French Wp. Holder (talk) 04:57, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Commentto JamesBurns: don't discuss about the participants, but discussion topic only, please. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 05:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kommentar to Holder: yes MARTHA WARTA 2000 & Kirk diamond are the same IP. But nobody can tell me is the quality of the article unacceptable for Wiki? Nobody knows about wikieditor motivations - we need decide about this article. Is this arcticle satisfactory? MARTHA WARTA 2000 & Kirk diamond behaviour at discussion pages is not legal, but the article (not discussion) is more important for wiki. Only unprofessional, agressive promotion campain paid an attention. If MARTHA WARTA 2000 & Kirk diamond made articles repliques in all wikies not like clone attack - it would be a normal wiki editing. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 05:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    So, Do you delete this the article? --Many baks (talk) 10:17, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    Why? Could you express if U see anything wrong on unclear in this article?--83.24.143.29 (talk) 13:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Article author has made a lot of effort to make the subject appear notable, but unfortunately the sources just don't live up to it. The first is a press release; the second only mentions the subject in passing; the third to fifth are simply listings from movie databases that substantiate the work he has done without providing any commentary; the sixth is a directory listing; the seventh is a catalogue, again only substantiating that he has done work on a particular film without contributing to notability; the eighth is an IMDB listing; the ninth is a youtube video and hence unreliable; the tenth is a primary source that substantiates merely that he was a losing candidate in an election. None of these sources offer substantial coverage in line with the requirements of WP:BIO. Given the amount of effort that has apparently gone into this article already, I would be very surprised to find better sources out there that haven't been included. JulesH (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Kommentar - this person is not a Playboy playmate (this kind of artists are notable persons for Wiki), he is a film maker. As I see two (or more) movies were made in the international coproduction. The author is Polish Film Academy member, so why not? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 06:06, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Because our guidelines are that we should only have coverage on people who have received substantial coverage in reliable sources, and nobody has pointed us to any such sources. Now, I'll admit that I don't speak Polish so can't realistically check that there aren't any such sources available, but it seems clear that this article has received substantial attention from Polish speakers who have failed to point us in the direction of any such sources, which suggests that they probably don't exist. Where are the magazine articles or newspaper articles about his work? I would expect to see these for any notable film director. JulesH (talk) 11:54, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep In my opinion definitelly notable, (Yes,Bogomolov -good comment) --83.19.4.26 (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per JulesH; lots of puff but no real substance. Also note the abundance of single-purpose accounts that came out for this. ThemFromSpace 06:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dariusz_Zawiślak&oldid=1086062365"