Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David L. Gilmore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:10, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

David L. Gilmore

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Run-of-the-mill county-level judge. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judges/Notability, judges of state trial courts of general jurisdiction are not inherently notable. I see nothing else in this subject's resume that would lift them into encyclopedic notability. BD2412 T 15:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Politicians. BD2412 T 15:41, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree and vote to delete. Every local and municipal official doesn’t get their own Wikipedia page. There is nothing here to indicate WP:Notability. Go4thProsper (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above and my own standards. Bearian (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.