Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Mackenzie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deborah Mackenzie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the GNG/WP:BASIC. I performed a WP:BEFORE and did not find any in-depth coverage of Mackenzie in independent reliable sources; no other notability guidelines are met, and no alternatives to deletion are apparent. DePRODder stated "may be notable" but provided no explanation or evidence in support of that conclusion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Not eligible for Soft Deletion. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:16, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I can't find any sources on google. Only websites that seem to auto generate data (like those net worth sites).
ForksForks (talk) 18:35, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.