Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Density (energy or power)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Density (energy or power)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disambiguation page that doesn't seem to disambiguate any plausible search term. Energy density was already listed at Density (disambiguation), and I've added the other two there as well. And Power density has a hatnote to Surface power density. If this were a plausible search term I might just redirect to the main DAB, but I don't think it's something anyone would type in naturally; pageviews are likely from search suggestions. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she|they|xe) 04:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:INCOMPDAB with an implausible disambiguator. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 04:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Power density is dabworthy. Density is too. Density (energy or power) is not.--Srleffler (talk) 05:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We don't need this disambiguation. 0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 10:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems unnecessary. BogLogs (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 13:53, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Not plausible search term as per Tamzin and LaundryPizza03; also violates the established usage of disambiguators as categories rather than qualifiers. —Quondum 14:25, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet the WP:D criteria Bruxton (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.