Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Detroit Paranormal Expeditions (DPX)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Detroit Paranormal Expeditions (DPX)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP, WP:GNG, coverage is trivial and confined to local news outlets and unreliable tabloids like the Daily Mail. The article was previously rejected at AFC with a recommendation of merging to Eloise Psychiatric Hospital, only for the initial editor to ignore the suggestion and move the article to mainspace. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:39, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Trivial and WP:SENSATIONAL coverage only. No serious, in-depth coverage that meets WP:NCORP to justify a stand alone article. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's Not notable in itself, so delete the Article.Forest90 (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable, likely conflict of interest by original page creator Darktalesblog (talk) 16:011, 27 April 2019 (GMT)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.