Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dian Grueneich (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Dian Grueneich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Non-notable person. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:49, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Appointed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and confirmed by the California Senate, Commissioner Grueneich is clearly notable. Johnfos (talk) 23:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Simply being appointed and confirmed would not be enough to qualify her as notable. However, she has been high-profile as a commissioner. She gets a ton of mentions in the press [1] and is clearly filling an important public role on the CPUC. I added a couple of news articles to the page. --MelanieN (talk) 03:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I notice that the previous nomination was closed as "snow keep," implying a strong consensus to keep, so I am puzzled why we have a second nomination now - offering no rationale except "non-notable". --MelanieN (talk) 17:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; pass of WP:BIO was clear in the first nom; WP:BIO is a subset of WP:N, and Notability is not temporary. Why a second AfD was requested, much less re-listed (all due respect to User:Ron Ritzman, who seems to handle the people-related AfDs), is beyond me. Aeternitas827 (talk) 09:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.