Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dirty Little Trick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Little Trick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Sources are trivial and fail WP:RS. A Google search turned up the usual mentions on sites like IMD that are excluded by RS but nothing substantive. Previously tagged PROD but tag was removed by anonymous editor. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:15, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I agree with the nom. I've had a search and can only find blogs etc. reviewing it, no RS. Someway off meeting WP:NFILM. SmartSE (talk) 20:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I remember looking for sources when this was up for PROD and I wasn't able to find anything to show notability. Nothing has changed since then and none of the sources on the article are the type that we could use as RS. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Doesn't look like there are any reviews outside of bloggers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:01, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I don't understand why a film with a former Superman actor and a million-dollar budget wouldn't get coverage, but if there's no coverage, there's no coverage. Nyttend (talk) 15:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.