Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EXPLOit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. RasputinAXP c 15:16, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EXPLOit

I googled and can't find any references to it. That's hardly conclusive - there are a ton of content management systems out there and plenty of them have exploits - so there is plenty of noise in the google results. The article doesn't tell the name of the manufacturer or link to their website so I'm inclined to think it could be either a hoax or a product that no longer exists. Still, even if it does exist, it doesn't appear notable. BigDT 02:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If it existed, by now it's sunk without trace. Kevin 02:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge has a section in Comparison of content management systems. It seems to be out of Italy,Dlohcierekim 05:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retain. It's made by a company called Document Solutions. You can find more infomration here. http://www.documentsolutions.it/versioneinglese/products.htm I would recommend not deleting this entry. They shouldn't be penalized in the wikipedia because they fail to understand SEO concepts.Lsirtosky 19:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC) The preceding comment is Lsirtosky's first contribution to Wiki.Tyrenius 19:16, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment EXPLOit has a section in Comparison of content management systems because MarcelloAprea gave it one in the section "Commercial Expensive (> $15,000)". This user also created the EXPLoit article. These have been MarcelloAprea's only contributions to Wiki, and neither of them provide any verification. Maybe it needs to be removed from Comparison of content management systems also. I don't have enough knowledge of these systems to be able to make an informed judgement. Tyrenius 19:18, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nominator, though I could live with Merging any useful content into Comparison of content management systems since it does seem to be a long laundry list. BigDT 01:32, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom. Beno1000 23:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.