Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/East San Jose
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep Eluchil404 07:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- East San Jose (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Origional research. Mostly gangland promotion.Jwissick(t)(c) 07:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- comment How about just deleting the However... paragraph with its original research and gangland promotion, and leaving the rest? 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 14:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep - It is an article (albeit short) on a relevant historical city and current subsection what is now one of the largest metropolitan areas in the United States. I agree the "However..." paragraph is almost certainly original research, but that calls for a cleanup tag, not an AfD nomination. The most you could ask for on this is a merge, and even that would be difficult to justify. -- Y|yukichigai (ramble argue check) 22:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Yukichigai. -- Bpmullins | Talk 23:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but providing better sourcing and remove original research items. Yamaguchi先生 03:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep I agree with Yamaguchi and Yukichigai. This is an important neighborhood in San José. It's true that the gang section is original research and not verifiable as is, but deleting those sections still leaves a decent article.Daisyporter 20:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.