Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Yuncza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 00:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Yuncza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial artists - wrote a few articles. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To be fair it might be worth looking at the page history. Quite a bit of information was deleted for being excessively promotional (I see copyvio issues also). The stub that remains does not say much. I don't think the deleted information would change the situation but the SPA creator may have been confused about tone and formatting. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:42, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only sources are articles he's written. Nothing shows he meets WP:MANOTE, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 18:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a one line article with no claims of notability. I agree with the previous comments that he doesn't meet GNG or the specific criteria for martial artists or authors, which are his stated fields. Papaursa (talk) 18:33, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lacks independent secondary sources to support notability. Cult of Green (talk) 23:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.