Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Ng (fighter)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 22:34, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Ng (fighter)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fighter with no top tier fights so he fails WP:NMMA. The only significant coverage is an interview at bloodyelbow.com and I don't know if that is considered a reliable source. Otherwise all I'm seeing are the usual links to fight results, sherdog, and blogs. That's not enough to show me he meets WP:GNG.Mdtemp (talk) 21:22, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. czar · · 23:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He clearly doesn't meet WP:NMMA and I don't believe his coverage meets WP:GNG either. Astudent0 (talk) 18:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMMA. LlamaAl (talk) 19:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.