Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Tyldesley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:13, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Elizabeth Tyldesley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not indicate notability, being the daughter of Thomas Tyldesley of Morleys Hall makes notability quistionable H66666666 (talk) 21:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I can see no reason why a short article with references on a member of a notable Lancashire family and abbess of a convent should be deleted.--J3Mrs (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I do see notability from her service as an abbess. —C.Fred (talk) 21:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. She sounds a remarkable woman; much more notable than many of today's "celebrities" who are accepted without question. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. She seems perfectly notable to me. Far more so than the minor footballers or soap stars who're considered to be sufficiently notable to warrant their own articles. Malleus Fatuorum 00:25, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Malleus. Jclemens (talk) 19:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per C.Fred. Nev1 (talk) 20:26, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- notable as an abbess for 45 years and for putting her Gravelines convent on a sound footing. However, do we not need an article on the hisoitry of this convent too? Peterkingiron (talk) 13:00, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm tempted.--J3Mrs (talk) 19:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Well attested and notable as an abbess. JASpencer (talk) 20:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, appears notable.SharedPlanetType (talk) 02:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.