Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Grenada in Washington, D.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Grenada–United States relations. Nothing worth merging that isn't already in the target article. Jenks24 (talk) 06:40, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Grenada in Washington, D.C.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. embassies are not inherently notable. those wanting to keep must show evidence of significant coverage for example about the building or actions of the embassy. LibStar (talk) 00:11, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to Grenada–United States relations. Neutrality^talk 08:42, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as not notable: Grenada–United States relations are notable, with the war and everything, but this embassy isn't of any significance. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:25, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.