Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Robi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Robi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Couldn't find any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, and subject doesn't appear to meet any WP:NACADEMIC criteria. Article was PRODed and deleted way back in 2010, and subsequently recreated. — SamX [talk · contribs] 04:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Businesspeople, and Computing. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I don't see significant coverage either. --Mvqr (talk) 11:33, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no significant coverage. --hroest 15:03, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence he passes WP:ACADEMIC criteria.

JamesKH76 (talk) 16:52, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no evidence of satisfying either WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Nsk92 (talk) 14:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The article subject doesn’t satisfy WP:NOTABILITY conditions per WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC, let alone WP:GNG. Shawn Teller (talk) 03:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.