Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Apple

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 11:44, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Apple

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter - did manage two top tier fights but both were losses. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 13:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He has three top tier fights two in Strikeforce and one in WEC. 74.103.250.78 (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:NMMA with three top tier fights. 74.103.250.78 (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep while he does pass WP:NMMA, I only found a few reliable sources on him from Mixed Martial Arts.com, FCFighter.com but not what I would consider enough to be "significant coverage" LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:53, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep He passes WP:NMMA, but barely. Lost all 3 fights--2 of which were for Strikeforce Challengers (which was just for "up and coming" fighters).Mdtemp (talk) 15:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems unlikely this person will achieve much more but that's beside the point. Does meet our MMA guidelines. Mkdw ^talk 06:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.