Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Explosion Fight Night (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No views in favour of keeping this in three weeks makes this a clear delete. Michig (talk) 09:55, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Explosion Fight Night

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a kickboxing organization that has put on one show in the past 18 months and only 5 in its history (dates back to 2010). All the article's sources are the organization's website. Other sources I found appear to be either press releases for upcoming events or results from those events--either way it's just routine sports coverage (see WP:ROUTINE). Jakejr (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Jakejr (talk) 02:18, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:51, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to be a minor organization with a lack of significant independent coverage. All of its events were previously deleted as non-notable. Mdtemp (talk) 17:26, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's no indication that this organization is notable. I found no significant independent coverage of this organization, just the usual routine sports reporting of results. Papaursa (talk) 01:01, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Possible delete if additional sources aren't found. After some detailed searching, I found two relevant links here, here, here and here and here. I'm not fluent in French or from France so I wouldn't know how much more to search but I'm not seeing much for this article. I'm happy to reconsider if other sources are found though as mentioned in the beginning of my vote. SwisterTwister talk 21:19, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 03:29, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Appears to fail WP:GNG and article fails to assert why the organization is notable. --TreyGeek (talk) 03:09, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.