Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Financial Condition Report
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tawker (talk) 07:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- Financial Condition Report (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Already exists at Financial analysis. No substantial contents, no reference. Perhaps qualify for deletion under WP:CSD#G2 criteria of speedy deletion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:49, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy Delete per CSD-A10. Could be merged but there is not much to merge. Vectro (talk) 17:15, 30 March 2014 (UTC)- Keep per Mark viking's notes and changes. Vectro (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I have rewritten the article with sources. FCRs are different than ordinary financial statements. The sources in the article and others not included, such as [1], show that there are multiple independent reliable sources discussing the topic in depth, so that the topic passes WP:GNG. If kept, I suggest that the article be moved to Financial condition report, per WP:TITLE. --Mark viking (talk) 19:23, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.