Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddy Retro
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 21:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Freddy Retro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article reads like a resume and is mostly self promotion. It fails WP:BIO. TM 18:50, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Claims of writing and producing hits that have charted on Billboard with no specifics. -- Whpq (talk) 17:04, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly fails WP:MMANOT. As for writing and producing Billboard hits, there's no evidence given to support those claims. Papaursa (talk) 18:06, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources, non-notable article. --Cox wasan (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.