Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederica Jansz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 07:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Frederica Jansz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

THIS PERSON IS NOT A NOTABLE PERSON IN SRI LANKA ANS SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED IN WIKIPEDIA, HAS NOT CREATED ANYHING MAJOR IN HER CAREER TO BE REOCNIZED NEITHER BEING RECOGNIZED IN SRI LANKA OR ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD Wikious123 (talk) 18:22, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - while we should assume good faith, this nom was made by a brand new WP:SPA who joined WP to ANGRILY nominate a BLP which has been controversial, and subject to IP vandalism and edit-warring. Suggest there is at least some WP:COI going on, if not WP:SOC. The article has a number of sources that appear to provide coverage of the subject. So in what way are you suggesting the subject does not meet WP:GNG? Are the sources not reliable? Otherwise I would suggest this is a WP:POINTY nomination and perhaps should be withdrawn. Stalwart111 (talk) 05:31, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Jansz was the editor of a national newspaper. Her newspaper's outspoken criticism of the government has meant that she is known inside Sri Lankan and outside. A Google search results in nearly 100,000 hits. Her recent sacking was even reported on the BBC website. I too have to question the motives behind the nomination.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 15:23, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.