Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Generation ucan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:44, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Generation ucan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

COI user has created page, despite Draft:Generation_UCAN being rejected. Promotional tone. Doubtable notability. See AfC for more info. TheDragonFire (talk) 07:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Highly promotional, notability not established. Probably could qualify for WP:CSD#G11. Many of the references are non-independent - the fact that at least 7 of the references link directly to shopping pages at generationucan.com is indicative of the motivation for this article's creation. Most of the remaining references in the article are not about the company or its products; they are about individual ingredients in the products. Deli nk (talk) 20:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete poorly referenced non neutral promotional content by a paid editor. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:29, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:08, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.