Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go-Kan-Ryu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:13, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Go-Kan-Ryu

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I will pretext this with declaring share of interest that I have some affiliation with Go-Kan-Ryu, also known by its acronym "GKR". It is not a "style" of karate itself, but a club/school that is influenced by traditional styles. Having said that, even I'm willing to suggest that the club is not notable enough for it to exist on Wikipedia. -- Tytrox (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete- most of the citations fail WP:IRS and the remaining 2 are non-substantial passing mentions. I would agree with the nom. Cabrils (talk) 21:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My search found no significant coverage of GKR itself in any independent reliable source. Passing mentions in local articles about students are not sufficient to show WP notability. Papaursa (talk) 00:54, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I concur. Not enough to go off of here in terms of sourcing to pass WP:GNG at this time. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 05:51, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.