Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grufferty
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doesn't seem to be a notable surname. Fences&Windows 21:02, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Grufferty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unreferenced article about surname with no assertion of notability whatsoever. WuhWuzDat 14:50, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Article mentions a good geographic spread of the name.Article should just be tagged for references not deleted.LadyofShalott 15:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I tried to find some reliable sources about the name, and have not so far. LadyofShalott 16:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —LadyofShalott 15:07, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Snappy (talk) 15:52, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice to re-creation at a later date if suitable references can be found in reliable sources. This may be a notable name, but there is so evidence of that so fa, or for any of the facts asserted in the article. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:06, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This confirms the abundance of the name in Mayo. De728631 (talk) 18:13, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.