Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannes Jacob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Endorsement by others does not establish notability (see WP:NOTINHERITED) and there is consensus that there are simply not enough sources to establish notability per any guideline. So Why 14:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hannes Jacob

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of significant independent coverage in reliable sources, i.e. fails WP:NBIO. Rentier (talk) 14:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I have added secondary sources and national TV coverage example (I called it "Mentions"). A lot of other previously listed independent sources (newspapers, magazines) had already been deleted by other editors, so these 3 sources should do as a sample. Mark Allsbrook (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2017 (UTC)— Mark Allsbrook (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete: While some local notability is possible, I cannot find mention in large international news papers like The Guardian. —Paleo Neonate – 21:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Coverage isn't significant; whatwe've got is confected & WP:PROFRINGE. Alexbrn (talk) 08:23, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: As a professor and scientist, Prof. Dr. Laura Martignon (PhD) of the Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) has already endorsed the subject, as you can also see from the book listed. Prof. Dr. Laura Martignon also predicts that the bridging of the two worlds of science-based and complementary medicine is impending. For those who don't know what the MPG is: The Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science is Germany's most successful research organization: Established in 1948, over 15,000 publications per year in internationally renowned scientific journals, produced 18 Nobel laureates, on par with the best and most prestigious research institutions worldwide. One can not simply call that "Unwarranted promotion of fringe theories". Mark Allsbrook (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.