Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Binswanger (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 11:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Binswanger

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, no evidence of articles/stories/books about the man. Hes given lectures (that's not special, many people do this) and he's appeared on Fox (that's not special, many people do this), and is a spokesman (claimed?) for a non-profit of a small cult. I don't see the evidence of notability. Merrill Stubing (talk) 13:10, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This article definitely has problems, including poor writing and a lack of sources in the article. Nonetheless, Binswanger's relationship with Rand is discussed in a number of sources (including The Passion of Ayn Rand, Ayn Rand: A Sense of Life, and The Ayn Rand Cult), and more recently he's been popping up as tv talking head, as even the nomination acknowledges. Does the nominator seriously argue that many non-notable people have been guests on multiple national tv news programs? --RL0919 (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Binswanger's relationship to Rand, his publications, his position within ARI, and his television appearances certainly combine to give him notability. TallNapoleon (talk) 07:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article has more than enough 3rd party sources to establish basic notability. Sailsbystars (talk) 19:25, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Multiple claims to notability; easily meets WP:GNG. Location (talk) 21:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Binswanger is known as an important figure within the Objectivist movement. UserVOBO (talk) 22:00, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.