Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard Model United Nations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Harvard United Nations simulations. There is a consensus that these simulations are just barely notable and that they should be merged into one article (non-admin closure). Pablo Talk | Contributions 02:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harvard Model United Nations

These articles are about the the three Model UN organizations based at Harvard. Despite being affiliated with one of the most distinguished schools in the world, I cannot find any coverage of any of these organizations in independent reliable sources, meaning they fail verifiability and notability guidelines. These articles have been tagged to be merged into one whole article about all Harvard Model UN organizations for months, but there has been no action on going through with this merger. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 23:55, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since no one seems to care, be bold and Merge them yourself. MarkBul 00:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It still wouldn't address the notability problems for the individual organizations. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 01:21, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Weak keep It's been some months since I last looked at them, but I do recall seeing a handful of relatively weak sources that, while not adequate to maintain separate articles, might have made something adequate when combined. That said, I don't have any notes from that far back, so we'd have to do it from scratch if we were to make with the merging. Deletion wouldn't be a bad alternative, given their current, quite stagnant, state. That said, a GNS search for Harvard+"model united nations" returns several relevant results without even hitting the archives. MrZaius^talk 07:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one and merge the others into it. (Disclosure: I was in four Harvard National Model United Nations from 1983 through 1986, representing four different nations for SUNY New Paltz.) Yes, it's notable as a set of competitions. A simple Google search may not help find much. Bearian 13:22, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not very notable.132.205.44.5 22:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep one and merge as Bearian suggests --there isnt enough material for all three, but as the major group of its kind, this one is notable. DGG (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
keep/merge all harvard - one of the oldest Model United Nations (claioms since 1920s) Mukadderat 23:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.