Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasford Heights, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ 12:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hasford Heights, California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence it really exists/existed; not in GNIS or Durham; none of the cited references mention the name Hasford Heights. No other hits indicate notability or existence. Might be a hoax. Glendoremus (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - If it's a hoax, it should go on Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia#Extant for 8–9 years (created on 8 April 2011)

Merge to List of Richmond, California neighborhoods. Source above says the neighborhood has a council but it's not on the map there... Smaller neighborhoods is not necessarily notable. Reywas92^Talk 06:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gildir (talk) 05:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kommentar It may not be a hoax per this Google maps result [1]. Bingobro (Chat) 10:41, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for this find; the geo-coordinates in the article point somewhere else. Glendoremus (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Google Maps scrapes data from other sources and often duplicates errors. Their description is lifted directly from Wikipedia. See WP:GNIS. –dlthewave ☎ 02:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete I've found several links (e.g. this list of neighborhood councils) which show that it is a neighborhood of Richmond, but I see no sign that it is notable in itself. Mangoe (talk) 13:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Glendoremus (talk) 15:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:02, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:42, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:59, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update Thanks to comment above, I see now that Hasford Heights is considered a neighborhood of Richmond, Ca. I've updated the article to reflect that fact and included the reference. I still don't think it's notable. There are more than thirty neighborhoods listed for Richmond and I don't believe we accept the typical city neighborhood as notable. Glendoremus (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 01:29, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete would appear to be too minor an administrative pocket to pass GEOLAND. ——Serial 16:20, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it is JUST a neighborhood see [[2]] Goldenrowley (talk) 20:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A non-notable neighborhood. newspapers.com returned no hits for "Hasford Heights". Google Books returned some books, but I could find no actual text. Cxbrx (talk) 00:37, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.