Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Kuzmich (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Timothytyy (talk) 04:18, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Kuzmich

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Indiana. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note to editors actually this is the third nomination of this article. The second nomination it was grouped with other articles. Catfurball (talk) 16:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 10:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think the NYTimes and the People articles are enough for GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 15:59, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I'm not sure why there is so little engagement here, but reading the first AfD, there were quite a few articles in national media that profiled her. Whilst it was several years back, current policy is that notability endures WP:NTEMP so there seems to me to be little policy based reasoning to !delete (unless there is some other WP:BLP reason that hasn't been mentioned here). JMWt (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Plenty of sources. Going to need more info from the nominator as to why these fail to meet WP:GNG. Garuda3 (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She doesn't seem to be notable outside of appearing in one season of a reality show. She received some coverage but almost all of it is related to her participation in a season of America's Next Top Model, and every contestant on the show probably received some media coverage. This could be considered routine coverage. I'm not sure this is enough to justify giving her a Wikipedia article, as it seems most reality show participants do not have their own article unless they achieved further fame elsewhere. JMB1980 (talk) 02:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A quick look at sources reveals the subject hasn't seen any significant coverage since December 2007. The page has been tagged for improvement for seven years, with virtually no coverage for the last fourteen years. While this is a human being who had a part on a tv show for one season, the sources don't pass EFFECT, PERSISTANCE, GEOSCOPE, DIVERSE or INDEPTH (NEVENT criteria, I'll grant). The AfD was held at the height of the subject's few minutes of fame. If this subject was a geographic feature or a species of flora, keep assertors would be correct; two or three reliable sources do directly detail the subject (in December 2007). But this is a BLP. As wikipedians we should do a living subject no harm, and a biography of a living individual dated over 14 years ago which cannot be updated represents neither the subject nor Wikipedia honorably. If not deleted, this should be redirected to the appropriate show season. BusterD (talk) 12:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.