Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavenly Body
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Heavenly Body (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable third-party sources could be found to establish notability. Also fails WP:BK. I believe the only reason the article was created was because it was licensed for translation into English, which is not a notability criteria. It is suspected that a representative of the publishing company originally created the article. Farix (Talk) 23:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, fails WP:BK, with no significant coverage in reliable third party sources or any reviews at all, despite having been released back in August. Known creation of confirmed Aurora socks using the site for self-promotion (5 or 6 blocked so far). No prejudice against recreation if it ever actually does receive any reviews. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Searches found no real coverage in English (and Japanese is beyond my ken). No sign it meets any other criteria of WP:BK. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. per above I'm running out of words (fourth afd in row). Please publisher do your homework by learning the basic rules of WP:N because we are doing ours by respecting your IP.--KrebMarkt 22:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.