Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herpestes The Electrifying Filipino Martial Arts
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 13:52, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Herpestes The Electrifying Filipino Martial Arts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The author decided to remove a PROD so I will nominate it here. There's no reliable sources on this whatsoever so notability has not been found. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 10:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nine pages of ghits for this title (without quotes) - virtually all forums, blogs, Youtube, Facebook etc. (Not LinkedIn or Aboutus, surprisingly.) Looks like a fair sized promotion campaign, or a lot of people talking about something only they know about. Not one reliable source. One Wikipedia article - on the Tagalog WP (but in English) - and that was unreferenced. Peridon (talk) 13:16, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- BTW Herpestes is a genus of mongoose. A search for herpestes martial didn't reveal anything of interest in 10 pages, except for one blogger or forum poster referring to Herpestes as maybe really being some obscure Philippine martial art. Peridon (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete Frankly, I can't believe a speedy was denied on this. There's no real claims of notability and no sources. I found nothing to show notability or reliable sources. Papaursa (talk) 17:49, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I declined speedy because it's a 'way' not a club. If it had been a club, it would have gone. Peridon (talk) 19:39, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No sources or indication of notability. Astudent0 (talk) 12:55, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.