Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hup Kwon Do

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:01, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hup Kwon Do

Article is totally without sources and makes no assertion of notability. Fails both WP:ORG and WP:MANOTE. Name got 700 ghits. I reviewed the first 60 and found they mostly sites affiliated with the art, forums or wikipedia/mirrors. None of the first 60 were a WP:RS. No hits on gnews. Absolutely no activity on the article since Dec. 2006. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Seems like a non-notable offshoot of Taekwando, I couldn't find anything of real WP:RS value on it. - 2 ... says you, says me 02:12, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree, just another small, non notable kwon do. Fuzbaby (talk) 02:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete : fails on notability. there's no shortage of 50-something and 60-something Korean fitness instructors using basic "spin control" and a slightly altered name which actually means "Plain Old Tae Kwon Do At More Expensive Rates" to advertise their chain of fitness centers as "new" and "original" and to have some kind of excuse for parading around in an expensive suit and tie trying to look more important than the other Korean fitness instructors they play golf with. This is one man's small chain of businesses and there are no reliable sources cited or easy to find to suggest there is anything warranting an encyclopedia entry. OfficeGirl (talk) 02:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn new art. JJL (talk) 03:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete chop. JBsupreme (talk) 04:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 14:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It seems like a non-notable offshoot of Taekwondo, and it just fails on notability. Bloodmerchant (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.