Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HyeFighters
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:41, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- HyeFighters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article has no independent reliable sources and gives no reason why this group is notable. It's not clear exactly what this organization does--the articles on some of the more notable fighters listed don't even mention it. The issue isn't whether or not some of the fighters are notable (some are, some aren't), but whether this organization is notable.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 13:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There's no indication of notability. In fact, I can't even tell what this group does to promote Armenian fighters--PR, coach, matchmake, or what? The lack of any independent reliable sources cements the decision for me. Mdtemp (talk) 22:55, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, and this type of thing will eventually push Wikipedia towards Craigslist. Should stop. History2007 (talk) 01:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable company/organization. I was unable to find any coverage in WP:RS; as such, organization fails WP:CORP. None but shining hours (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:GNG as I couldn't find any secondary sources and the only source the article cites is the domain registration information for the organization's website. --TreyGeek (talk) 18:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no notable results on google and nor looks like one. →TSU tp* 21:45, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above reasons and lack of third party sorces to establish notability-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 06:20, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.