Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J.A.T.D.Nishantha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

J.A.T.D.Nishantha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any evidence of notability for this supposed university professor. Fails WP:GNG test. No citations found on google scholar, so fails WP:ACADEMIC as well. PROD contested. —Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) talk 15:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No references in article, no citations found on GS, fails WP:PROF, WP:BLP. -- Radagast3 (talk) 00:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. -- —SpacemanSpiff 09:03, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No evidence presented that he meets WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Article cannot be kept in its present state, but he has appeared on the cover of Newsweek [1]. Abductive (reasoning) 09:41, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There does seem to be a lack of evidence. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.