Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Fresh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 08:10, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Fresh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unfortunately I was unable to find enough reliable coverage for this clothing brand. A search revealed mostly false positives, with the only hits of note being a partnership with DJ Lady Duracell (who herself does not have a Wikipedia entry). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Although DJ Lady Duracell does not have a Wikipedia entry at the moment, she is frequently top 10 in the podomatic deep house music charts, and has many sources to prove that she is a well known DJ. Her official website and social media networks also have consistent updates supporting the Jack Fresh brand regularly.Yas at NewMatter (talk) 14:48, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the nominator's reason. The page had been speedy deleted once as promotional(which I nominated) as there seemed to be few sources(as the nominator found themselves). There seems to be little that is remarkable about this. 331dot (talk) 20:27, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When DJ Lady Duracell started using the term Jack Fresh, I wanted to know more, if you are unaware; she was voted 57th best DJ in the world and 15th best DJ in the UK by SheJay magazine. She has also had music in the HMV music store, and is regularly top 10 in the podomatic charts.

When she started saying Jack Fresh a few months ago, I and others wanted to know what she meant; after doing research, I decide to create a Wikipedia page.

Yes, the previous page created was deleted for not following guidelines, the page was not created from a natural point of view, and had too many links, I did not dispute the fact, or the reason for the deletion. Instead I took a look at the guidelines, striped the page of its links that were considered promotional, and have produced this new article.

Now that I am dedicated to the maintenance of this page, and will work on a DJ Lady Duracell page soon, I would prefer you guide me in the right direction, so, I don’t waste any more of your time.

At the moment the only problem seems to be not enough sources, however, the sources I have given can be viewed by the public, and I will edit the page to provide better links or more links within the next few days, all information is verifiable via DJ Lady Duracell, & via the brands official website, other independent sources have also spoken about this clothing brand. Yas at NewMatter (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now (draft & userfy if needed) as my searches found nothing good either. SwisterTwister talk 03:44, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since this discussion began:

The DJ Lady Duracell Wikipedia has been created & links back to Jack Fresh
The Jack Fresh page is no longer an orphan page
The Category section of Jack Fresh is filled
The Infobox has been recreated
The trading name Reference has been replaced

This page should remain open Yas at NewMatter (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find absolutely nothing to establish notability. RichardOSmith (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.