Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Power (priest)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 05:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- James Power (priest) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This priest appears to fail WP:NPOL, WP:NBASIC, and WP:ANYBIO.
On a side note, reference 4 in the article do not appear to actually link to the website for the City of London, but to some database, and it's a suspicious link. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:12, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete -- There is nothing in the article to suggest notability, merely a NN clergyman with some side appointments. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:43, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Anglican priest with only local significance at best. Generally only bishops survive AfD unless there's other evidence of notability, which I cannot find in this case. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Not seeing much here to meet WP:NPRIEST. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:03, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.