Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Cruz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie Cruz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed deletion removed without explanation. I cannot find anywhere near sufficient sourcing to sustain this article or demonstrate notability, only the barest and most trivial of mentions/name drops, nothing extensive at all. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:10, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 05:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 05:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is an unsourced BLP that gives no reason why the subject is notable. Having notable instructors (or instructors of instructors) does not show notability (WP:NOTINHERITED). Papaursa (talk) 20:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unsourced BLP. SL93 (talk) 02:08, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article has no reliable sources and the only claims to notability are that he has a well known instructor and that he teaches BJJ. Neither claim is sufficient for notability (see WP:NOTINHERITED and WP:MANOTE). Mdtemp (talk) 18:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.