Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasur Hasanov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was revert to disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:07, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jasur Hasanov

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A resume with three citations, two of which are self-published and the third of which doesn't mention him. A search turned up nothing better. Fails WP:NBIO. I propose revert to the version of 7 May 2015, which was a {{hndis}} page overwritten by this article Narky Blert (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 15:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep as no argument has been provided for deletion, which would include deletion of article history. If this needs to be reverted then simply do it, and, if that is then contested, discuss the issue on the article's talk page. This is all a matter of simple editing rather than deletion. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 10:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced self-promotional WP:COI. Restore the page to the disambiguation page from before all the fluff was added. [1] older ≠ wiser 11:33, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, if this is deleted the history will also be deleted, so there will be nothing to restore. Edits get reverted all the time without the need to delete the pages first or discuss them at AfD. Why can't this simply be reverted without going through such a long-winded bureaucratic process first? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 11:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy revert to the necessary dab page as before the incorrect over-writing edit of 15:02, 12 January 2018. I was about to do so but then noticed the AfD template so had to hold back on it for now. PamD 13:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Restore dab [2] Boleyn (talk) 10:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete overly promotional article that is no where close to being shown to cover a notable subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But why delete, which would get rid of the original disambiguation in the history, rather than revert to it? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 08:33, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Just speedily recreated the dab page for now, and moved it to the main namespace... Only problem with the idea of restoring the dab page from this page's history, would be that the entrepreneur page has more history in that namespace. Any suggestions? For now, though, the main namespace of "Jasur Hasanov" should definitely be the dab page. No sources have been given to prove that the entrepreneur is more of a notable primary topic than the footballers. Paintspot Infez (talk) 13:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good idea. The history of the pages and the AfD will now be quite a mess. Please don't move a page while an AfD is happening - it would have been better to let this discussion take its course. I'm not going to try to unpick your changes, for fear of making matters even worse at this stage. PamD 17:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shoot, so sorry. I screwed up. Should I try to fix it back? Paintspot Infez (talk) 17:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed it back; sorry about that. Bad call on my part, and I fully apologize. It won't happen again. Paintspot Infez (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy revert to dab page. Upon further inspection, this would be the best course of action. Paintspot Infez (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.