Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Joslin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:02, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Joslin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is an MMA fighter who fails WP:NMMA with only one top tier fight. There is also no significant independent coverage of him since the article's only source is simply a link to his fight record. Even the external links are just to his fight record or his personal web page. Papaursa (talk) 02:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 02:38, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 03:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough top-tier fights to pass WP:NMMA, not notable enough to pass WP:GNG. Luchuslu (talk) 21:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One top tier fight is not enough to pass WP:NMMA and the article gives no other reason to consider him notable. The only source given is his fight record, so that's another problem. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Fails WP:NMMA and doesn't has enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Poison Whiskey 14:01, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:NMMA, WP:ATHLETE, WP:GNG. --LlamaAl (talk) 14:16, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As stated above does not meet the requirement of NMMA, and subsequently no further content or reliable sources that assert individual notability under WP:GNG. Mkdw ^talk 21:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.