Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer York
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. given improvements made to the article since its nomination. Liz Read! Talk! 22:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jennifer York (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not finding the kind of independent, significant coverage required to pass WP:GNG. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 05:27, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Journalism, Radio, Television, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - A scan shows little to no independent, non-incidental coverage. Dclemens1971 (talk) 22:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep this article about an award-winning journalist and musician, since an adequate WP:BEFORE check does not seem to have been done here, especially since this nom was originally bundled. Satisfies WP:NJOURNALIST #4. Per WP:HEY, I have begun the process of adding significant, reliable and independent sourcing. StonyBrook babble 09:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- I indeed did perform a WP:BEFORE, though I don’t always catch every source. None of the awards confer notability–iffy on whether it meets WP:NJOURNALIST #4. The new sources aren’t bad though. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- In fact, it sails past GNG now. StonyBrook babble 06:49, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I think that with the improved sources it is better ThreeBootsInABucket (talk) 23:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.