Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Higgins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Higgins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced BLP of an artist who does not meet general notability criteria evidenced through significant independent coverage, nor does she meet the more specific WP:CREATIVE. The article was created by User:Artistorganizedart, which is the website of the only link included in the article, therefore it would appear that, in addition to the sourcing and notability issues, the article is a promotional piece. Jezebel'sPonyo ^shhh 17:37, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as article fails notability criteria for artists. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 19:57, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fails WP:GNG. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 19:22, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. Strange Passerby (talk) 08:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE, at least according to what sources I can find. --j⚛e decker ^talk 21:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.