Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Colombo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Colombo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article. Another by sock farmer who promo'd sports subjects who fail notability. In this case, very limited local coverage which derived from subject's tragic injury and amateur organization's championship. Still insufficient to pass WP:NKICK or WP:GNG. X4n6 (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. X4n6 (talk) 10:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:11, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage needed to meet WP:GNG and fails to meet the notability standards for kickboxers at WP:NKICK. Mdtemp (talk) 08:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at best as this currently suggests he's still questionable for the applicable notability and it's quite unlikely the article will improve because of his death. SwisterTwister talk 04:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.