Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Ambriz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 06:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Ambriz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMMA. His highest ranking by Fight Matrix was 28th in the world heavyweight rankings, which is short of the top 10 requirement. Also fails WP:GNG. The subject lacks significant coverage through independent and reliable sources. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 02:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:14, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Fails to meet WP:NMMA and lost more fights than he won. I don't see any sources that clearly show significant independent coverage of him. I see database listings along with fight announcements and results, but that's true of any pro fighter. There's nothing to show WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 23:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.