Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joaquim Valente

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Both articles. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:14, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joaquim Valente

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial artist. Studying BJJ under the Gracies doesn't make him notable and he has no sporting success to show he meets WP:NSPORTS or WP:MANOTE. Lacks the significant independent coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. Article has the usual unsupported claims about training police and military personnel. Mdtemp (talk) 17:03, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Unusual unsupported claims about training police and military personnel"??? This must be a hater trying to delete the article about a martial art professor who received his belt and professor diploma from Helio Gracie himself. Only 27 people in the world have achieved this. About military and LE instruction, Valente has taught local and federal law enforcement departments and most of the US military branches. Recently these guys were teaching the elite of the Navy. Just do a search on google and you will find all the info on them. These guys are recognized around the world as being the most legit instructors in self defense and yes they are NOT competitors and hove NO fame for that. THEY ARE PROFESSORS AND FOR THAT THEY ARE VERY HIGHLY RECOGNIZED AND FAMOUS.

I wrote this article because I saw a big piece on him on Ocean Drive magazine and on a Record TV. I did some research online and found a lot of evidence on the Valente's. It is very useful to keep this article online. Miamijj1 (talk) 20:34, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

— Miamijj1 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following page because it is very closely related (his brother) with similar credentials:Peter Rehse (talk) 21:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Much of the content has wrong or irrelevant information. Non of the accomplishments are notable enough for an article.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:15, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 02:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both My search didn't find multiple cases of significant coverage in reliable independent sources and there's nothing in the article to show they meet any notability criteria. Notability is not obtained from one's instructor. Papaursa (talk) 15:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.