Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Hers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 05:44, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Previously submitted for Speedy/A7. Resubmitting as NN per WP:BIO (per below; should be kept). Groeck 15:47, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, he has a variety of Lilac named after him. While he may not be über-famous, for a Chinese botanist from 100 years ago, he's as famous as they come ;) Sherurcij 15:56, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- You got me there. I had wondered what botanized was supposed to mean and thought he was some railroad engineer; I did not get the connection to him being a recognized botanist. Changing my vote to keep based on the additional information (I am not a Lilac hater, btw ;-). Groeck 18:27, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, convert all lilac haters through the power of reason. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 16:14, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Stupid lilacs... always making me sneeze... Keep and Expand with a list of the varieties of lilacs he discovered, if possible.--Isotope23 18:47, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 22:57, 23 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand, I'll go note the lilac page for any experts there. Alf melmac 09:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This should be a speedy keep now. ··gracefool |☺ 16:32, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.