Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jovi Ware
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Jovi Ware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to meet the Notability (sport) requirements, particularly those reserved for High School sports people; High school and pre-high school athletes are notable only if they have received, as individuals, substantial and prolonged coverage that is (1) independent of the subject and (2) clearly goes beyond WP:ROUTINE coverage. Note that the first clause would exclude all school papers and school websites along with most sport specific publications. The second clause excludes the majority of local coverage, especially game play summaries, statistical results, or routine interviews E. Fokker (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be a vanity page. No indication of martial arts notability. Much of the article is on his father and instructors and notability is not inherited. Claim of being undefeated in "backyard amateur exhibition fights" is meaningless and participation in a teenage division of the first event of a new grappling organization also fails to show notability. Papaursa (talk) 02:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete I agree with the previous posters. The organization appears to be a very small local organization--how else do you fight as both a beginner and expert in the same event and fight the same guy twice? At best he appears to be the second or third best teenage wrestler in a town of 1300. Astudent0 (talk) 13:16, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No evidence this is anything but a vanity page--no notability or reliable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.118.229.17 (talk) 22:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.