Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan de Miralles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 17:16, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juan de Miralles

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article does not seem to be sufficiently notable. The topic of the article does not seem to have played a big role in the american war of independence. Also it does not cite any sources, and the article itself does not seem to be covered well by reliable sources. As such i don't think it qualifies as notable enough for a stand-alone article. King Of The Wise (talk) 17:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Withdrawn by nominator". Seeing the other editor's views and visiting and researching for sites related to the articles (which, i know, I should have done before nominating the article) I realized that I did a mistake in nominating this page. I probably did this in a hurry, which was pretty bad of me aw'right, and should have done better research on the topic beforehand. Well anyways, sorry for troubling you guys. I don't usually do this, and always double check what I do, this time..... Anyways, I'll improvise upon my mistake and withdraw this nomination. Sorry again :) Won't do this again. Thanx for participatin' in the discussion.King Of The Wise (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Google books has lots and lots. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. There's plenty of material about him.[1][2][3][4] A little effort WP:BEFORE would have scotched this Afd in the bud. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.