Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Hahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 08:24, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Hahn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A small number of sources of varying reliability about the hiring (WP:BLP1E) and nothing since. It's hard to find anything that's better than what we already have, which is, frankly not much. Guy (Help!) 22:47, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:02, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Coverage of her White House roles extends from January to November 2017. It's gone quiet since, but coverage was not just of her appointment, and notability doesn't expire.--Andreas Philopater (talk) 21:34, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Hahn has received a lot of independent coverage -- and not side-mentions: 1,2,3,4,5,6 Clearly meets WP:GNG and should be kept. --1990'sguy (talk) 18:20, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.